Roulette Computer Comparison Chart

Detailed comparison of all roulette computers

NOTE: While our devices are more expensive, you get what you pay for. Most other devices produce near random predictions on modern wheels, contrary to false claims from the device sellers. The right technology is often the difference between hundreds of thousands in profit, or a clear loss.

ORIGINAL Uber Roulette Computer

roulette-computers.com

Single Player: US$12,500 Two-Player: US$15,000

REMOTE Uber Roulette Computer

roulette-computers.com

US$20,000

Includes equipment for 3 players.

Remote Hybrid Roulette Computer

roulette-computers.com and hybridroulettecomputer.com

US$80,000

Lite Roulette Computer

roulette-computers.com

Single Player: US$2,950 or US$1,950 (depending on phone model)

Two-Player: US$3,950 or US$4,950 (depending on phone model)

* The older (and cheaper) phone model has the same functionality but is slightly larger.

Basic Roulette Computer

roulette-computers.com

US$950

Mark Howe PDA, Mobile Phone & Evolution

Other Reviews

Forester's FFA-U and FFZ

Other Reviews: FFA | FFZ

Star Ratings (the "short story")

Ratings for various elements. To know why ratings are as such, you need to read this whole chart and understand the differences between devices.

Accuracy: how accurate predictions are on common modern wheels

Practicality: how practical it is to use in real casino conditions

Early predictions: how early predictions can be, while maintaining accuracy

Stealth: how difficult an experienced user is to detect for casino staff (higher rating means more difficult to detect)

	Accuracy	Practicality	Early Predictions	Stealth
Remote Hybrid (ours)
Remote Uber (ours)
Uber two-player (ours)
Uber single-player (ours)
Lite two-player (ours)
Lite 1 single-player (ours)
FFA single-player (other)
FFA two-player (other)
Basic Computer (ours)
FFZ (other)
MH PDA (other)
MH Evolution (other)
MH Mobile phone (other)

NOTE: The differences in accuracy are more apparent on wheels that are more difficult to beat. For example: on an average modern wheel in casino conditions, the less effective computers may have no accuracy at all, whereas the more powerful computers cn achieve a 1 in 10 hit rate (one win per 10 spins if you bet only 1 number).

Furthermore, the more sophisticated computers are easier to use. For example, the Hybrid version uses a hidden camera and equipment to automatically measure wheel and ball speed, and predict the winning number. This is considerably easier and more accurate than the other computers, which rely on you clicking a small button typically hidden under your toe. The "toe switch" versions (all except Hybrid) all use sophisticated algorithms to make timing errors insignificant. The Uber and Uber Remote V2 also use manual clicks of hidden buttons, although multiple players can take timings simultaneously, which eliminates any significant timing errors.

Ultimately the more sophisticated the roulette computer, the quicker, more accurate, easier and therefore more profitable it is to use.

Hardware & General Description

Modified mobile phone: modified to ensure suitability of hardware.

Timing accuracy within 1ms.

Almost identical to the "Remote Hybrid" except ball and rotor timings are measured using clicks of a hidden button (usually in shoe). A hidden camera is not used.

Timings can be taken by 1 to 4 individuals simultaneously, to ensure virtually error-free timings. Only 1 players is needed.

Timings are transmitted via wireless Internet to the server with minimal buffering to ensure timing accuracy.

The server calculates predictions and relays them to any amount of players.

Image recognition hardware and software: aim a camera and predictions are made automatically.

Timing accuracy within 1ms.

One or more hidden cameras stream live video via wireless Internet to the Hybrid server, which calculates predictions and relays them to any amount of players.

No sensitive equipment is ever taken inside the casino. The main equipment ever taken in the casino are standard smartphones (1 per player).

Modified mobile phone: modified to ensure suitability of hardware.

Timing accuracy within 1ms.

Modified mobile phone: modified to ensure suitability of hardware.

Timing accuracy within 5ms.

Psion 3a PDA: Mark Howe computer Hardware is suitable for required functionality, but large and difficult to conceal.

Evolution: This is basically a "thumper", which is more a visual ballistics aid than roulette computer. It pulses vibrations at regular intervals. To know where to bet, you must observe the location of the wheel's numbers at the time of vibrations. This is very difficult even in the home environment, but near impossible in the casino because you cannot feel the vibrations properly. The accuracy is comparable to visuabl ballistics.

Mobile Phone: Unmodified phone with average timing accuracy of 50ms. It runs background processes with timing errors up to 500ms. The accuracy is virtually random (no accuracy). It appears to be a rushed and un-tested device.

NOTE: The only significant difference is the FFA version gives audio predictions, whereas the FFZ version gives electric zaps as explained below.

PIC Microcontroller: Forester IQE6 FF All of this vendor's versions use microcontrollers.

IMPORTANT: The vendor claims his hardware is accurate to 0.0001MS and that this means his devices are most accurate. His claim is misleading because manually clicking a button to take timings has about 50MS error. So the total error of his computer is about 50MS + 0.0001MS = 50.0001MS

In other words there's no significant difference between a 1MS error from mobile phones and 0.0001MS error from microcontrollers. The difference is about 1MS, which is negligible.

Same Spin Testing

This is a simple test where the same spin on DVD is repeatedly predicted. If the computer cannot accurately process timings, the predictions will be significantly different each time.

This is not a test of prediction accuracy. It tests only the ability to deal with timing errors from the player clicking the hidden button. Basically the tighter the groupings, the better.

This testing was done by connecting all three devices to the same switch, then predicting the same spin. This way each computer received exactly the same data to process.

Same spin testing

Learn more about comparative testing with ours and other devices

The Hybrid computer takes automated timings with no significant errors. It processes video at 30 FPS although it detects the ball and rotor position multiple times for each revolution. This virtually eliminates timing errors. So if it predicts the same recorded spin, the prediction is the same each time.

Language for Menu and audio predictions

English by default. Any language available by request.

N/A (no audio)

English

FFV: No audio

FFA: English

Wheel Timings Data Acquisition:

This is how the computer knows what the wheel and ball timings are

Manual clicks (subject to human error) although it has exceptional error correction.

The 2-player version allows the second player to take timings, which halves timing errors.

Ball and rotor timings are measured using clicks of a hidden button (usually in shoe).

Timings can be taken by 1 to 4 individuals to ensure virtually error-free timings. Only 1 is needed.

Image recognition hardware & software: a hidden camera and image recognition equipment automatically determines wheel and ball speed. There is virtually no error in timings.

Manual clicks (subject to human error) with reasonable error correction

Manual clicks (subject to human error). Each of these devices also have very poor error correction approaches, if any at all.

Manual clicks (subject to human error) although error correction is very good

Does the computer predict which diamond will be hit, which part of the diamond will be hit, and how the ball will hit the rotor?

Most computers incorrectly assume the ball is going to hit the wheel rotor (the part with the pockets) at a point where the ball reaches a certain speed. This is incorrect because the ball may hit a vertical diamond, or a horizontal diamond, or it may not hit any diamond at all. Whatever the case, the ball's behavior is very different for each type ball fall. A computer that does not account for different types of ball falls will produce virtually random predictions on modern whee4ls. In fact this is designed to be the case for modern wheels - it is the very purpose of vertical and horizontal diamonds.

YES. It can predict which diamond will be hit, and the part of the diamond that will be hit (accurate to within 1/3rd of a diamond), and the manner in which the ball will fall (under reasonable conditions).

In other words, if the ball clips a horizontal diamond then lands on the other side of the wheel, the computer predicts this. Or if the ball misses all diamonds completely, the computer will adjust for the different type of ball fall.

NO. It assumes the ball will fall exactly the same way irrespective of whether the ball hits a vertical or horizontal diamond, or if the ball doesn't hit any diamond at all.

NO. All versions assume the ball will fall exactly the same way irrespective of whether the ball hits a vertical or horizontal diamond, or if the ball doesn't hit any diamond at all.

All versions do not correctly predict where the ball will fall from the ball track in the first place. It also doesn't correct the errors from manual timings (clicks of a button). It is therefore not even partially capable of predicting diamond hits.

FFZ & FFA: Attempts to predict diamond hits, but with very poor accuracy. This is partially because it assumes the ball deceleration rate will remain the same, when it actually gradually changes due to air pressure and other variables.

Average exact number hit rate on MODERN LEVEL wheels (about 1% of wheels)

The number of wins if you covered just one number. Remember this is for MODERN wheels you see in real casinos - they are very different to cheap or secondhand wheels.

1 in 25

1 in 23

1 in 22

N/A (not designed for level whees)

All versions ineffective (random results)

Average exact number hit rate on MODERN SEMI-TILTED Wheels (about 94% of wheels)

The number of wins if you covered just one number

1 in 20

1 in 17

1 in 16

1 in 28

1 in 30

All versions ineffective (random results)

1 in 30

Average exact number hit rate on modern heavily TILTED Wheels (about 4% of wheels)

The number of wins if you covered just one number

1 in 13

1 in 11

1 in 10

1 in 18

1 in 20

Psion 3a PDA: 1 in 25

Evolution: 1 in 30

Mobile Phone: No accuracy

FFA: 1 in 20

FFZ: 1 in 25

Accuracy Vs Wheel Tilt Charts

These charts show the accuracy of each computer with relation to wheel tilt. Only a correctly constructed computer will increase in accuracy as wheel tilt increases. This is very important because most wheels are neither tilted or level (neither perfect or heavily flawed)- they are in fact somewhere in-between which makes computer design far more complex. The green area shows the degree of tilt for most wheels. The relevance of these charts is very important to understand.

Accuracy chart

The green area shows the area for 95% of wheels. Accuracy increases as wheel tilt increases. The computer deals with level wheels, heavily tilted wheels, and semi-tilted wheels. Approximately 95% of wheels are semi-tilted

Accuracy chart

Competing chart

The green area indicates 95% of modern wheels, where accuracy is minimal. This is because the computer incorrectly assumes the wheel is either:

1. Physically perfect (which it never is), or

2. Heavily flawed (which it very rarely is).

In reality, most modern wheels have slight imperfections, but these subtle flaws make an enormous difference to where the ball will actually fall.

Competing chart

The green area indicates 95% of modern wheels, where accuracy is minimal. This is because the computer incorrectly assumes the wheel is either:

1. Physically perfect (which it never is), or

2. Heavily flawed (which it very rarely is).

In reality, most modern wheels have slight imperfections, but these subtle flaws make an enormous difference to where the ball will actually fall.

Competing chart

The green area indicates 95% of modern wheels, where accuracy is minimal. This is because the computer incorrectly assumes the wheel is either:

1. Physically perfect (which it never is), or

2. Heavily flawed (which it very rarely is).

In reality, most modern wheels have slight imperfections, but these subtle flaws make an enormous difference to where the ball will actually fall.

Competing chart

The green area indicates 95% of modern wheels, where accuracy is minimal. This is because the computer incorrectly assumes the wheel is either:

1. Physically perfect (which it never is), or

2. Heavily flawed (which it very rarely is).

In reality, most modern wheels have slight imperfections, but these subtle flaws make an enormous difference to where the ball will actually fall.

Wireless Capable

Without wireless capabilities, only single user application is possible. This means you need to take timings of the wheel, then quickly place bets all by yourself. This means you can't stand at the betting table where you need to be. Furthermore, you will be looking at the wheel then making sudden late bets, which very easily reveals to casinos that you are a roulette computer user. Professional computer teams MUST use more than one player to ensure covert application.

YES (only for 2 player version).

The wireless is encrypted and uses frequency hopping technology so transmissions appear as random static. It is almost impossible to detect.

Range of 30m with perfect sound quality

YES

The wireless is encrypted and uses frequency hopping technology so transmissions appear as random static. It is almost impossible to detect.

Remote version: Unlimited range (uses mobile internet connection)

YES

The wireless is encrypted and uses frequency hopping technology so transmissions appear as random static. It is almost impossible to detect.

Remote version: Unlimited range (uses mobile internet connection)

YES (only for 2 player version)

The wireless is encrypted but does not use frequency hopping. It is still very difficult to detect.

Range of 30m with perfect sound quality

All versions: No

FFA: Yes, it uses a bluetooth muse with very short rangle (1-2m) with poor sound quality. The radio signals are easily detected.

FFZ: No

Ability to beat Automated Wheels

Automated wheels typically have in-build "countermeasures" that are supposed to make roulette computers ineffective. However, in most cases, the countermeasures are actually ineffective.

YES, plus it includes features to assess whether or not the automated wheel has countermeasures, and to what degree.

YES, but only about 10% of them.

All versions: NO

YES, but only about 5% of them. Although you need to ask the seller to manually program the device to set the rotor deceleration rate to zero. You need to have it modified again if you want to switch back to live dealer wheels.

Quick Resuming of play on each day

For a typical roulette computer, to set up for each new wheel and begin obtaining accurate predictions, you need to have calibrated over approximately 15-30 spins. In a real casino environment, this may take up to an hour before you even make a single profitable bet. "Quick Resuming" enables the player to resume "profitable play" without needing to repeat the setup process each and every day. Typical computers require setup on each new day because the ball deceleration rate of the ball will vary on different days. This is because of air pressure variations on different days.

YES, once you have set up for a wheel and calibrated over about 30 spins, you do NOT need to repeat the process on each new day of play. To setup completely for each new day, you need only 1-5 spins.

NO, you must completely re-do everything from the start each time you play.

Ability to determine where ball will actually fall from the ball track, even when the ball gradually changes the distance it travels (air pressure variations)

The ball's deceleration rate is constantly changing, so the computer must adjust or the predictions will gradually become less accurate. This is a critical feature and without it, you will often achieve no accuracy.

YES, tuning is done automatically while you play. Accuracy is confirmed by audible beeps at the precise moment when the ball is predicted to fall.

The variation of the ball's deceleration rate is automatically learned.

YES, tuning is done automatically while you play. Accuracy is confirmed by audible beeps at the precise moment when the ball is predicted to fall.

The variation of the ball's deceleration rate is automatically learned.

YES, tuning is done automatically while you play. Accuracy is confirmed by audible beeps at the precise moment when the ball is predicted to fall.

The variation of the ball's deceleration rate is automatically learned.

Psion 3a PDA: NO

Evolution: NO

Regarding above: The seller claims otherwise but testing clearly indicates his claims are false. This is easily confirmed with basic testing you can do yourself.

Mobile Phone: Attemps to adjust for air pressure, but the algorithms are completely ineffective.

NO. There are new features that attempt to do what's required. But they are ineffective on most modern wheels. The main problem is it doesn't correctly learn and adjust the ball deceleration curve. It still assumes the ball deceleration is linear.

Ability to make predictions when the ball is at the same speed

On wheels with particularly deformed ball tracks, accuracy is greatest when the ball reaches a specific speed. By isolating the ball speed, accuracy can be improved.

YES. The feature can be toggled ON/OFF. When it is ON, accuracy can be maximized. When it is OFF, predictions can be obtained at any point in the spin to ensure you receive a prediction at the latest point in the spin possible.

Psion 3a PDA: NO

Evolution: YES

Mobile Phone: NO

All versions: YES. It can also be toggled off so you get predictions anytime in the spin, although this results in near random accuracy except for about 4% of wheels (heavily tilted).

Ability to generate predictions
"anytime" in the spin

If a computer simply continues to calculate timings after each click you make, and only gives a prediction when the ball reaches a particular speed, very often it will be incapable of giving any prediction on spins. This means you can spend hours in the casino with very few predictions.

YES, for level, tilted and semi-tilted wheels. The user can instantly switch to different modes (isolating ball speed, or "anytime" predictions) without significant loss in accuracy.

Psion 3a PDA: YES, although accuracy is very poor for easily beaten wheels. And there is no accuracy for level and semi-tilted wheels (95% of wheels)

Evolution: NO

Mobile Phone: YES, although accuracy is random.

All versions:YES, although accuracy is very poor for easily beaten wheels. And there is no accuracy for level and semi-tilted wheels (95% of wheels)

Instead of learning the full ball deceleration curve, it attempts to find which ball speeds have linear deceleration. This means you can only get sufficiently accuracy "anytime" predictions on heavily tilted wheels, or wheels where the ball deceleration rate doesn't change at all.

How the player is told where to bet

Wireless earpiece (covert audio): single number, OR any amount of numbers you want (so for example the computer can announce 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 or more numbers very quickly). This is important as you don't need to memorize the wheel layout, and begin profiting in less time.

Speakerphone (audio): excellent for practicing, OR

Vibration mode (covert): Vibrations can be used many different ways defined by the user. With the vibration feature, you can set the computer to vibrate when the prediction is above the winning number (as Forester's FFV is used), although this is no different to his FFZ, and very impractical). So if you use the vibration feature, it can be used in a variety of much more practical ways. The user can select the desired option and switch between them instantly

Speakerphone (audio): excellent for practicing, OR

Speakerphone (audio): excellent for practicing

Vibrations only

Psion 3a PDA: Single or 4 numbers only, via wireless earpiece

Evolution: Vibrations only

Mobile Phone: Single or 4 numbers only, via wireless earpiece.

FFZ: After taking clicks to establish timings, the device will give you an electric zap. When you get the zap, you see what number is under the moving ball. To get your actual prediction, you must then manually and visually rotate the initial number by the required angle, and see what number is at that angle on the wheel. You do this for every spin which is almost impossible to in the comfort of home let alone real casino conditions. This is because the ball is way too fast to see the numbers accurately, and in real casino conditions you cannot possible see the wheel from a top view. The latest version gives two zaps in case you missed the prediction the first time. This helps but you still lose a few pockets accuracy because of difficulty.

FFA: Single number only, via wireless earpiece.

Variable Vibration Intensity and Duration

YES, you can make vibrational pulses have any duration or intensity you like

N/A (no vibration)

Psion 3a PDA: No vibration

Evolution: NO

Mobile Phone: No vibration

FFA AND FFZ: N/A (no vibration), although this seller has a vibration version which replaces the FFZ's electric zaps with vibrations.

Prediction Process

What is required to make one prediction

Single player version: Two wheel rotor clicks (either full, half revolution, or two revolutions), and either 2,3,4,5 or 6 ball clicks. The order of which is clocked (timed) first can be set by the user (either ball or wheel rotor first).

Two player version: Two wheel rotor clicks (either full, half revolution, or two revolutions), and either 2,3,4,5 or 6 ball clicks. The order of which is clocked (timed) first can be set by the user (either ball or wheel rotor first) OR both players can take timings of the wheel at the same time. This feature enables players to achieve accurate predictions in as little as 1 second after ball release. No other computer has this capability.

You have a very broad range of options to suit any conditions. It is very important to have flexible options, otherwise you will often not get predictions in time.

When the spin begins, one or more players begin clicking a hidden button as the ball and green zero complete revolutions, ntil a prediction is received.

The wheel and ball can be timed independently and simultaneously, but between 1 and 4 players. The more players that take timings, the earlier and more accurate predictions are. Rarely is more than 1 "clocker" is needed (the player taking timings), but the recommended amount of clockers is 2.

Stand near the wheel with the hidden camera. A remote user can adjust aim. When the ball is released, the computer automatically predicts the winning number and sends any amount of bettors the numbers to bet on.

There is very little players at the table need to do. They mostly just focus on betting.

Two wheel rotor clicks (full revolution) and 3-4 clicks for the ball. You then receive the prediction via wireless earpiece.

Take timings for the ball only until the vibration occurs. Note the number under the reference point then place your bets.

Application requires more of an element of skill than our other versions do.

Psion 3a PDA: First 2-3 ball clicks, then two wheel rotor clicks. In most cases, this is an incorrect order which degrades accuracy.

Evolution: Click when the ball is at a specific point, and monitor vibrations until the frequency of vibrations matches the ball speed. Then observe the number under the ball, and mentally adjust for the numbers you need to bet on. It is very difficult in the home environment, and near impossible in the casino.

Mobile Phone: Two clicks for the wheel, then 2 - 5 clicks for the ball.

First 2 clicks for the wheel, then continual clicking for the ball until a prediction is given.

Ability to operate even when you can only see part of the wheel

Rarely do you have a perfectly clear view of the wheel. Computer use must be practical in such situations.

YES, you only need to see the ball and zero pass.

YES. User doesn't even need to look at the wheel.

YES, you only need to see the ball and zero pass.

YES, but for proper application you will need to accurately memorize the wheel layout.

Psion 3a PDA: YES, you only need to see the ball and zero pass.

Evolution: NO, you need a top view of the wheel for this device to be viable, because the zap may occur at a point where you can't see the ball.

Mobile Phone: YES, you only need to see the ball and zero pass.

FFZ: NO, you need a top view of the wheel for this device to be viable, because the zap may occur at a point where you can't see the ball.

FFA: YES, you only need to see the ball and zero pass.

Number of players that can receive predictions with wireless versions

The purpose of using wireless technology (legally) is so not one specific player is looking at the wheel while winning big (to avoid suspicion). If only ONE operator can receive predictions, there is little point to using wireless technology. Multiple player ability is "must have" for serious players.

2 for the two-player version, although additional accessories can be purchased which enable more players.

Unlimited

2 for the 2-player version

1 for the 1-player version

N/A (no wireless)

FFZ: 1

FFA: 2, although the wireless is very easily detected by casino surveilance equipment.

Number of signal bursts required for prediction

The less sophisticated the wireless technology, the more signal bursts are required, and the easier the signals are to detect

Single player version: 1 burst. The only wireless signal ever sent is an extremely short burst of data that tells the 2nd player where to bet. There are no emissions at all during the timing process.

Two player version: 1-2 bursts

1 burst

Single player version: no wireless

Two player version: 1-2 bursts

N/A (no wireless)

At least 5 bursts, and each is very easily detected. There is one radio emission for every click of the button when you take timings.

FFZ: n/a (no wireless)

FFA: The wireless setup is basically a mobile phone bluetooth headset, which gives a continuous and easily detected radio emission.

Wireless Encrypted

YES, plus frequency hopping is used to ensure emissions are virtually undetectable. Additionally, the wireless is completely invisible to network scans.

YES (wireless applies only to two-player version)

N/A (no wireless)

NO. Detecting the signals only requires a basic receiver. There is no frequency hopping or anything to reduce the potential of the device being detected.

FFZ: N/A (no wireless)

FFA: NO

Variable Sound Volume and Induction Loop signal strength

Induction loop signals are easily detected if the signal intensity cannot be adjusted.

YES. Adjust to your comfort levels, and to minimize radio emissions from the induction loop. The loop can be detected but only at very close range, and you'd know if someone got that close to you. If you prefer to use no induction loop, this device can rely predictions entirely from phone vibrations.

YES. Adjust to your comfort levels, and to minimize radio emissions from the induction loop.

N/A (no audio)

The mobile phone version allows you to adjust audio levels, but the pda version does not. The audio intensity is acceptable for the pda version, but extremely poor and barely audible for the mobile phone version, indicating the seller has likely never even used his own devices for real-play.

FFA: NO. The sound volume and radio emission from the induction loop (the part that transmits audio to the wireless earpiece) is set far too high, and cannot be changed. This means anyone with a hearing aid as much as 2 feet away from you can hear what you hear. This presents a serious risk of detection.

FFZ: n/a (no audio)

Wireless Earpiece & Induction loop

YES. Can produce predictions with a wireles earpiece (with induction loop), or via phone vibrations (without induction loop).

YES

YES (each phone sends audio to only one player. so the 1-player version sends audio to 1 player only, and 2-player version gives predictions to 2-players)

YES

FFA: YES

FFZ: n/a

Tuning (very important):

Without tuning, predictions are called "raw predictions". Tuning is essential for accuracy.

Visual, Manual, Advanced Automatic Tuning, and Dynamic Algorithms.

Manual with in-built charts: the computer builds a scatter chart for you that you can observe anytime. You observe the charts and rotate predictions to tune manually. The tuned predictions are rotated a set number of pockets. If the wheel is outside a speed range you set, the computer notifies you.

Advanced Automatic Tuning: using proper statistical analysis, the computer will automatically tune the computer for you as you play. If the wheel is outside a speed range you set, the computer notifies you.

Dynamic Tuning: The greater the wheel speed, the further the ball will come to rest from the point of "raw prediction". The "dynamic" feature will automatically tune for each spin based on the speed of the wheel when the ball is predicted to fall. For example, if the wheel timing is 4000MS, then the ball may come to rest +5 pockets from the "raw prediction". If the wheel speed is 3000MS (faster), the ball may come to rest at +15 pockets from the raw prediction. This is a 10 pocket difference. Without this feature, ordinary computers would give predictions as if the wheel speed were the same every time, which it's not. Without this feature, even if a computer perfectly predicted where the ball will actually strike the wheel rotor, the difference in wheel speed between spins may make other computers almost completely ineffective.

Visual, Manual, Advanced Automatic Tuning, and Dynamic Algorithms.

Manual: You manually create charts and rotate predictions to tune manually. The tuned predictions are rotated a set number of pockets.

Psion 3a PDA:

Manual with in-built charts: the computer builds a scatter chart for you that you can observe anytime. You observe the charts and rotate predictions to tune manually. The tuned predictions are rotated a set number of pockets.

Evolution:

Manual: You manually create charts and rotate predictions to tune manually. The tuned predictions are rotated a set number of pockets.

Mobile Phone:

Manual: You manually create charts and rotate predictions to tune manually. The tuned predictions are rotated a set number of pockets.

FFA & FFZ:

Manual: You manually create charts and rotate predictions to tune manually. The tuned predictions are rotated a set number of pockets.

Segregation charts for rotor speed: It can tell you the jump values for specific speed ranges. The process is tedious and still ineffective. For example, say you had 60 spins on total. 30 spins are for rotor speed 3-4s, and 30 spins are for rotor speed 4-5s. What you've then done is split your data into two inadequate charts. Instead what should be done is use all data combined to create a dynamic model to properly deal with the different ball bounce on different rotor speeds. Furthermore, if you don't have enough spins for a different rotor speed range when a new dealer begins, then you'll have no reliable data at all.

Risk Assessment

Lets you know when a prediction is likely to be inaccurate due to various factors

YES

It tells you if timings are likely to be inaccurate. It also accurately assesses whether or not the resulting prediction is less likely to be accuracy (adjustable tolerance settings)

YES

It tells you if timings are likely to be inaccurate. It also accurately assesses whether or not the resulting prediction is less likely to be accuracy (adjustable tolerance settings)

YES

It tells you if timings are likely to be inaccurate. It also accurately assesses whether or not the resulting prediction is less likely to be accuracy (adjustable tolerance settings)

All versions: NO

All versions: YES.

It tells you if timings are likely to be inaccurate. But it has design flaws that do not accurately model the ball's deceleration. So it will not accurately assess risk on modern wheels in casino conditions.

Adjusted predictions based on wheel rotor speed

Most computers tune the computer based on the assumption the wheel is the same speed on every spin, which is not the case.

YES, you can set tuning settings so the computer adjust the prediction for specific wheel rotor speeds. This ensures accuracy is optimized over any wheel rotor speed. This can be done with automatic or manual settings.

YES, you can set tuning settings so the computer adjust the prediction for specific wheel rotor speeds. This ensures accuracy is optimized over any wheel rotor speed.

All versions: NO

FFA: Partially. This version allows you to set a different "ball bounce distance" for particular wheel speed ranges. This approach is inadequate as explained in earlier points.

FFZ: NO

In-Built Scatter Analysis

Where the ball falls and actually strikes the rotor (part with pockets) is NOT necessarily going to be where the ball actually comes to rest. So the computer needs to make adjustments and determine where it will bounce to.

YES, scatter chart and in-built automated statistical analysis of the scatter chart. You do not need to leave the roulette wheel to manually analyze the chart and specify the tuning settings - it is all done automatically.

You can also see all data on charts with detailed analysis to determine your edge.

Psion 3a version: Scatter chart only. You must manually check the scatter graph away from the roulette wheel, then manually tune. The tuning is not automatic.

Mobile phone version: no scatter chart at all. You must manually draw a scatter chart on paper. This is highly suspicious at the roulette wheel.

Evolution: NO, the computer does not have any in-built scatter chart of any kind. Scatter analysis must be done entirely manually with pen and paper in front of casino staff.

Most versions: NO, the computer does not have any in-built scatter chart of any kind. Scatter analysis must be done entirely manually with pen and paper in front of casino staff.

FFZ: Saves some internal data but you cannot physically see any charts. So you have no knowledge of how strong the edge, and how safe it is to bet large.

Ability to make accurate predictions with 8-10 revolutions before the ball falls on level wheels

YES, such early predictions are possible for all wheels providing the ball track is not too deformed (creating far too erratic ball behavior).

NO, unless the wheel is very heavily tilted.

All versions: NO

FFA: YES but only if the wheel is heavily tilted (4% of wheels). NO on typical wheels in the real casino environment.

FFZ: NO. Although it uses much the same algorithm as the FFA, the ball is too fast at this point for you to accurately observe which number is beneath it, especially when you can only see the ball part of the time.

Can take timings of partial revolutions

Without this feature, predictions are given significantly later on slow wheels (rotor).

1 player version: YES, but with significantly decreased accuracy unless the wheel is slow.

2 player version: YES, and both players can take timings of the same spin, which virtually elminates errors even when timing partial revolutions.

YES, and it can use up to 4 different "clockers" (players who take timings) to almost elminate timing errors.

YES. It only needs to see about 1 second of rotor motion, and the green zero can be in any visible location.

Psion 3a PDA: NO

Evolution: NO

Mobile Phone: Yes, but predictions are random.

YES, but with significantly decreased accuracy unless the wheel is slow.

Ability to test accuracy of samples before play

This helps you confirm the sample data you obtained is accurate.

YES, You can monitor the ball fall time accuracy. But this is only suitable for heavily tilted wheels. On most wheels, you will not have any knowledge or warning of more subtle errors that have a large impact on prediction accuracy. These issues are resolved as the computer learns the ball deceleration, and updates all data retrospectively. So if the computer learns it was previously incorrect, it automatically updates all previous data and learns from its mistakes.

YES (audible beeps heard and/or vibration felt when ball is predicted to fall). This allows you to instantly test samples for accuracy rather than play 30+ spins only to find out your samples are inaccurate.

It saves precise data on how accurate ball deceleration calculations were. It can either automatically adjust, or be manually adjusted. This ensures the ball deceleration rate is correctly modeled.

NO, if your samples are inaccurate, you wont know until you play 30+ spins

All versions: NO, if your samples are inaccurate, you wont know until you play 30+ spins

All versions: You can monitor the ball fall time accuracy. But this is only suitable for heavily tilted wheels. On most wheels, you will not have any knowledge or warning of more subtle errors that have a large impact on prediction accuracy.

Seller's real name / verifiable company name given

Why is this important? Consumer protection authories have a madate to pursue dishonest corporations, which is why purchasing from corporations is generally safer.

YES, a PTY LTD Corporation.

NO (fabricated personal name and company name. The company name "Mark Howe Technologies" does not exist in any jurisdiction)

YES, but a sole trader only (not corporation).

Personal Demonstrations

YES, also group demonstrations are provided. See the videos page for recordings of previous public demos, and register to attend a demo.

YES

NO. This seller previously did, although no longer does after 3 professional gamblers announced their findings after witnessing a failed demonstration. The seller did demonstrate to media once, although on an easily beaten tilted wheel.

Independently tested

YES, it was sent to a well-known and trusted member of vlsroulette.com who validated our claims. The tester stated the following:

"I can assure you that what I tested was legit, and keep in mind that I was testing on one particular diamond for testing purposes, I could have tested any other diamond but we tested only one,and the test was not to test predicted numbers but only a diamond, and the test was accurate.

And to cap it all, Steve put me in contact with one of his players here in my country and we met up and discussed the computer and he was getting very good results. I can not let out what we discussed, but I can tell you that you would have to be very serious about playing this way and if applied correctly with timing in placing your bets you would do very well, thats all I can tell you"

But keep in mind you don't need to take anyone's word about anything. We provide free trials and public demonstrations where you can do any reasonable testing you want, and on any wheel.

Yes, and the tester (Michael Barnett) came to the same conclusions we did.

TESTING OF FFZ:

Regarding Barnett's tests on a physically flawed (tilted) wheel, he stated:

"At the precise moment of this "zap", the operator must observe the number that is directly under the ball. Given that the ball is traveling in one direction at the rate of around 2.5 meters per second and the rotor is traveling in the other direction at about half that speed, this is no mean feat, particularly in view of the fact that you don't know when or where this zap will happen. If you are to have any hope in identifying the number under the ball at zap time you'd better hone your peripheral vision skills."

He also stated:

"FF does a good job of giving you a consistent reference point on wheels that exhibit stator bias (drop_zone) but there are several others that do this relatively trivial task (for a computer) equally well and don't require you to have the visual acuity of a Nighthawk."

In other words, it's basic algorithms can beat raw heavily flawed wheels, but for the trivial task of beating such flawed wheels, the design is very poor.

Regarding his tests on a roulette wheel that is not physically flawed (level), he stated the following:

"When the device did produce predictions the results were close to random. The testers were unable to obtain a statistically significant advantage on any of the test sessions. "

We agree with his findings, although he neglected to state prediction with this device is only "possible" if you can see the ball when the zap occurs. This is likely because his testing was done with slow motion video to ensure the correct predicted number was obtained.

After further testing on a typical casino wheel that isn't heavily flawed, Mr Barnett stated:

"The device has not shown that it has sufficient, if any, predictive capabilities to overcome the other factors, which govern the final result after successful strike-point prediction against a wheel with random ball exit-point characteristics

Time will tell if there is a viable threat to modern well-maintained roulette wheels but at this stage the FF device is not it."

The vendor misleads purchasers about the test results by publishing only the positive comments, which related to easily beaten wheels only. The tester then released further information publicly stating the following to the vendor:

"I have no hesitation in eating my words and apologizing publicly if you and he are able to get a result.By using me on your website and spreading my name all over industry forums and anywhere else that you thought it would help you, you left me no choice but to report what I found"

Basically the vendor publishes manipulative claims about the test results. The tester clearly stated the computer was NOT a threat to casinos. The only exception is if the wheels used are heavily flawed.

Roulette Computer Comparison Chart

Why Some Computers Are Ineffective

� Copyright Natural Laboratories PTY LTD / roulettephysics.com, all rights reserved.